Dianne Eppler Adams, Astrologer/Writer

Spirit In Matters Logo

  Dianne Eppler Adams

  Bringing Spirit into Everyday Life

Home
About
Services
Blog
eNewsletter
Other Writing
Workshops
Testimonials
Links
Contact

 

 

SPIRIT IN MATTERS: Taking a Higher View of Life on Earth
By Dianne Eppler Adams

Vol. 2, No 11 – July 26, 2004
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read online at - http://www.spiritinmatters.com
Enjoy this newsletter? Pass it on so others can enjoy it too! 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FROM THIS VANTAGE POINT...

     Loving and Letting Go

There is a natural process in life that involves letting go.  As there cannot be an “in” breath without having just breathed out, so life itself does not complete its process, its expression until it lets go.

However, often we resist the letting go part.  How long may we hold on to the past before the holding on becomes a deadening action on one’s own potential and future.  Some people, I notice, let themselves deteriorate along with the memories of the past. Change is harder to some than others, it true, but there’s no denying it as an integral process of life.

Look at the natural world. There’s really no way to keep life from bringing the change called winter. We harvest the crops and then let go, only to discover new growth in the spring. It would be foolish to try to hold onto the tomato plant. We could shield it from the cold and snow, but it would still die. Our actions would be futile and a waste of time. Nature knows that what grows must die and that new growth will come.

How then can we approach the many circumstances in our lives when we face a time of letting go?  I suggest that it is by loving that we are able to let go easily and with grace, knowing there will be new growth somewhere as a result.

If, for example, dear friends announces their move hundreds of miles away, it your love of them and happiness for their great new job that eases the loss of their presence in your everyday life. When your child leaves for college, by recognizing with love this important step in their maturity, you can celebrate the event rather than mourn their departure.

When my sister died recently, it was my love for her and my belief that she was now much better off having left the physical suffering she had endured for years that allowed me to let go of her sweet loving presence in my earthly life.

Loving and letting go can be applied as well to numerous other situations. I belong to an organization that has been very influential to my growth. The charismatic leader of the organization passed away and for several years the energy of the group has been primarily focused on the past. Little or no new life or growth has occurred, only gatherings that reminisce about past activities, how great they were and how important the leader’s teachings.

This reminiscence is a good thing if it is part of loving and letting go, but a deterrent to new life if it is an express of holding on to the past and denying change. Out of that organization have grown many new projects and initiatives spawned by individuals who were influenced by the deceased leader. Yes, new life is possible for every member as a result of letting go.

Perhaps the best that we can do when we face a situation or circumstance that calls us to let go is to go deeply into the love that is there. In recognizing the love present, we can find peace in letting go and an ability to see the new life that becomes possible.

We can let go through loving, because love never dies even though the person, the organization, the situation will surely end sometime.

(Your comments are always welcome at SpiritInMatters@aol.com.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION...

MORE AMERICANS SEEK GOD ON THEIR TERMS, AND IN THEIR HOMES
By G. Jeffrey MacDonald, Correspondent, The Christian Science Monitor
http://www.christiansciencemonitor.com/2004/0721/p01s01-ussc.htm

The Rev. Tom Caiazzo calls it The House of Grace, but it's also the house of Reverend Caiazzo himself. The congregants who gather in this Boston-area residence twice a week for prayer and preaching hope to someday establish their evangelical church in a more public space.

Meanwhile in Austin, Texas, the people who gather every other week at the residence of internist Cecilia Schulte to talk about God generally agree they'll never find a more suitable setting.

These represent two faces of a growing trend toward religious life that occurs in the most humble of sanctuaries: the home.

In some cases, the groups are nascent churches, perhaps fledgling global movements. In others, they're more akin to a book club where informality is the glue that holds a group together for discussions of divine grace.

But the bottom line is that for many Americans, worship is no longer centered exclusively under a steeple. In an era of long commutes, overloaded schedules, and made-to-order spirituality, religious experience increasingly means venturing into someone's home for refreshments and a taste of God on far more personal terms.


The `UBUNTU' OF GLOBALIZATION
By Julian Hewitt  |  July 12, 2004
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/07/12/the_ubuntu_of_globalization/


In South Africa, we have a term, "Ubuntu," which refers to the spirit of the community. It is a shortened version of a South African saying that comes from the Xhosa culture: "Umuntu ngumuntu ngamuntu." This means that I am a person through other people. It means that my humanity is tied to yours. This is probably the single most important aspect of living in a highly connected planet: Our humanity is tied together. We must respect each other, and we must always keep our interconnection in mind.

The United States needs to understand the meaning of these South African phrases more than any other industrialized nation. The ultimate global power, the United States creates ripples that cause big waves around the world. This happens more frequently than the average American comprehends.

When Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan cuts interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point, it has a huge impact on me in South Africa. Straight away it influences my still sizable student loan, as the South African financial markets react to this news by preempting a cut or a hike by the South African Reserve Bank in response to rate changes in the United States. Ripples run through the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, and dollars will either be cheaper or more expensive for me to buy. In short, globalization enables Greenspan's small action relative to US markets to have a large effect on me 13,000 miles away in South Africa.

... Twenty or 30 years ago, there would be nothing wrong with an American who never left home, never owned a passport, never spoke a second language, never knew the capital of Denmark. But we live in a globalized world. We live in a world of causes and effects. We live in a world where a single superpower has an overwhelming influence on global affairs.

Today, there is hypocrisy: The United States plays the key role in our globalized society, but its citizens are not globalized. Holding such a position of global influence without having a global worldview is not just naive, it is dangerous. It is dangerous to be the source of global ripples but to ignore their effect.

Over time, those ripples may cause waves that will slap back on your shores.


RECOVERING A HIJACKED FAITH
By Jim Wallis, Special to the Boston Globe, July 13, 2004
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/07/13/recovering_a_hijacked_faith/


Many of us feel that our faith has been stolen, and it's time to take it back. A misrepresentation of Christianity has taken place. Many people around the world now think Christian faith stands for political commitments that are almost the opposite of its true meaning. How did the faith of Jesus come to be known as pro-rich, pro-war, and pro-American? What has happened? How do we get back to a historic, biblical, and genuinely evangelical faith rescued from its contemporary distortions?

That rescue operation is crucial today in the face of a social crisis that cries out for prophetic religion. The problem is clear in the political arena, where strident voices claim to represent Christians when they clearly don't speak for most of us. We hear politicians who love to say how religious they are but fail to apply the values of faith to their leadership and policies.

When we take back our faith, we will discover that faith challenges the powers that be to do justice for the poor instead of preaching a "prosperity gospel" and supporting politicians who further enrich the wealthy. We will remember that faith hates violence and tries to reduce it and exerts a fundamental presumption against war instead of justifying it in God's name. We will see that faith creates community from racial, class, and gender divisions, prefers international community over nationalist religion and that "God bless America" is found nowhere in the Bible. And we will be reminded that faith regards matters such as the sacredness of life and family bonds as so important that they should never be used as ideological symbols or mere political pawns in partisan warfare.

The media like to say, "Oh, then you must be the religious left." No, and the very question is the problem. Just because a religious right has fashioned itself for political power in one predictable ideological guise does not mean those who question this political seduction must be their opposite political counterpart.

The best public contribution of religion is precisely not to be ideologically predictable or a loyal partisan. To always raise the moral issues of human rights, for example, will challenge both left- and right-wing governments who put power above principles. Religious action is rooted in a much deeper place than "rights"-- that being the image of God in every human being.

Similarly, when the poor are defended on moral or religious grounds, it is not "class warfare," as the rich will always charge, but rather a direct response to the overwhelming focus in the Scriptures, which claims they are regularly neglected, exploited, and oppressed by wealthy elites, political rulers, and indifferent affluent populations. Those Scriptures don't simply endorse the social programs of liberals or conservatives but make clear that poverty is indeed a religious issue, and the failure of political leaders to help uplift those in poverty will be judged a moral failing.

It is because religion takes the problem of evil so seriously that it must always be suspicious of too much concentrated power -- politically and economically -- either in totalitarian regimes or in huge multinational corporations that now have more wealth and power than many governments. It is indeed our theology of evil that makes us strong proponents of both political and economic democracy -- not because people are so good but because they often are not and need clear safeguards and strong systems of checks and balances to avoid the dangerous accumulations of power and wealth.

It's why we doubt the goodness of all superpowers and the righteousness of empires in any era, especially when their claims of inspiration and success invoke theology and the name of God. Given human tendencies for self-delusion and deception, is it any wonder that hardly a religious body in the world regards the ethics of unilateral and preemptive war as "just"? Religious wisdom suggests that the more overwhelming the military might, the more dangerous its capacity for self and public deception. Powerful nations dangerously claim to "rid the world of evil" but often do enormous harm in their self-appointed vocation to do so.

The loss of religion's prophetic vocation is dangerous for any society. Who will uphold the dignity of economic and political outcasts? Who will question the self-righteousness of nations and their leaders? Who will question the recourse to violence and rush to wars, long before any last resort has been unequivocally proven? Who will not allow God's name to be used to simply justify ourselves, instead of calling us to accountability?

In an election year, the particular religiosity of a candidate, or even how devout he might be, is less important than how his religious and/or moral commitments and values shape political vision and policy commitments. Understanding the moral compass a candidate brings to his public life and how his convictions shape his political priorities is the true litmus test.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Help your brother's boat across, and your own will reach the shore.
---Hindu proverb
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
©2004 Spirit in Matters: Taking a Higher View of Life on Earth
501 Slaters Lane #422, Alexandria, VA 22314. All rights reserved.
Permission is granted for reproduction or redistribution in its entirety only.